Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same Deity?

The Piper I Like.  I have been involved in mult-faith dialouge – but I agree with moderate-conservative Religious Jews, Muslims, and Hindus – we DO NOT worship the same God!

Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same Deity? (Episode 71):

I don’t care how many attributes line up between your god and mine. Jesus says you can’t be worshipping the Father if you are rejecting him [in the Son]. And that is the approach I think we should take with all Muslims. We should befriend all of the Muslims in our lives and there are many, at least in my neighborhood. And we tell them the unsearchable riches of Christ, and especially go to the gospel where the glory of God is revealed in the death and the resurrection of Christ. – John Piper

Why Do So Many Muslims Embrace Religious and Ideological Warfare?

Shelby- Remember our Arab and Persian christian brothers and sisters have lived with this violence more than any of us.

April 21, 2013

Why Do So Many Muslims Embrace Religious and Ideological Warfare?

By Victor Sharpe

Mahatma Gandhi is quoted in his book, Gandhi: The Power of Pacifism, by Catherine Clement, as follows:

 

While Hindus, Sikhs, Christians, Parsees and Jews, along with several million adherents of an animistic religion, all coexisted in relative harmony, one religion that would not accept compromise stood out from the rest: Islam.

 

Gandhi was referring to the experience during his lifetime in the Indian sub-continent, but the growth of Wahhabism and the current resurgence in Islamic triumphalism since Gandhi’s death in January 1948 now poses an increasingly existential threat to the West, to Judeo-Christian civilization, as well as to Hindus, Buddhists, and members other faiths.

 

The question repeatedly posed by the talking heads on the TV networks and cable television is how and why so many Muslims, young and old, are living in the West and enjoying all the material and educational benefits bestowed upon them — and also committing hideous acts of terror and perpetrating atrocities upon innocent civilians, even against their very own neighbors.

 

The Times Square bombing attempt on May 1, 2010 by Pakistan-born Faisal Shahzad and the 2009 Fort Hood massacre of unarmed members of the military by Major Nidal Hasan (still described by the problematic U.S. administration as “workplace violence”) are well-known.  So too is the attempt at terrorism by a Somali immigrant, Mohamed Osman Mohamud, who had come to America at the age of five with his family as a refugee from the hell that is Somalia, and who attempted to kill thousands during a Christmas tree-lighting ceremony in Portland, Oregon.  But until the Chechen Muslim brothers succeeded in their massacre at the Boston Marathon, most terror attacks had been thwarted since the 9/11 destruction of the Twin Towers and part of the Pentagon by the 19 Saudi Arabian hijackers, in which 3,000 people were murdered.  This time, however, the Muslim miscreants succeeded.

 

It was the baleful President Carter who undercut the shah of Iran, an autocrat who jailed and restricted the jihadists and Islamic groups but who was nevertheless a supporter and ally of America.  Just like President Obama, who equally undercut Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, the subsequent void was quickly and gleefully filled by Islamic fundamentalists and the Muslim Brotherhood who imposed sharia law and raised the banner of Islamic supremacy.

 

With the shah’s fall came the Ayatollah Khomeini from his exile in France, and almost immediately Carter’s foolish act resulted in a seemingly endless and most definitely humiliating imprisonment of American Embassy staff in Tehran.  Since then Iran has fed the flames of Islamic terror around the globe, arming, and funding terror organizations such as Hamas and Hezb’allah.  Ayatollah Khomeini preached violence to ultimately conquer “the land of the infidel.”  By that he meant Israel, Christian European states and Britain, the United States, and the entire non-Muslim world.  His followers throughout the Muslim and Arab world have all endorsed the legitimacy of jihad against what they call the “enemies of Islam.”  Islamic martyrdom operations — specifically blowing up soft targets like the spectators at sporting events — are guarantees to paradise even if the victims are children.

 

So the answer to those talking heads in the media who endlessly ask why so many Muslims commit such atrocities can be seen both in Koranic passages and in, for instance, the sickening hate indoctrination found in the government-controlled Palestinian TV and radio broadcasts.

 

Here are some of the grisly passages from the Koran:

 

“Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191

 

“Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Koran 9:123

 

“When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5

 

“Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85

 

“The Jews and the Christians are perverts; fight them.”… Koran 9:30

 

“Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33

 

“Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water; melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19

 

“The unbelievers are stupid; urge the Muslims to fight them.” Koran 8:65

 

“Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.” Koran 3:28

 

“Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12

 

“Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.” Koran 8:60

 

And here are some examples of the Palestinian broadcasts that sow hate among children as young as three years of age, spawning yet another generation of terrorists and destroying hope of any true and lasting peace with the embattled State of Israel.

 

For example, the children’s show, The Best Home, included a scene in which a young girl recited a poem filled with messages of hate and other libels demonizing Jews.  The poem made the vile and fantastic assertion that Jews, “Allah’s enemies, the sons of pigs,” defiled the Quran and Jerusalem, “murdered children,” “cut off their limbs,” and “raped the women in the city squares.”

 

This message of vitriol — aimed at the future generation of Palestinians — not only serves to foster hatred and violence, but undermines the very essence of coexistence and peace.  It poisons the minds of innocent young children instead of promoting respect for one another, which is a cornerstone for true peace.

 

In our politically correct world, members of the media and commentators often seek to distance Islam from so many acts of horrific violence, using terms of alleged distinction such as “radical Islam” or “moderate Islam” and so on.  But let us reflect on the words of Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the close friend of Iran’s genocidal president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

 

In reply to the term “moderate Islam,” which was apparently quoted to him by a Western journalist, Erdoğan said: “These descriptions are very ugly; it is offensive and an insult to our religion.  There is no moderate or immoderate Islam.  Islam is Islam, and that’s it.”

 

Certainly, attempting to constantly give, as liberals do, a free pass to Islamic abuses; to play down its violent ambitions of world conquest; to ignore the evident threat to Judeo-Christian civilization from sharia law and imposed dhimmitude merely encourages the violent tendencies of the followers of what has been called “an ideology wrapped in a religion.”

 

The two Chechen brothers thus almost certainly succumbed to the hatred towards non-Muslims which proliferate in Islamic texts, on Islamic websites, and in Islamic social media.  And they are not alone.

 

Victor Sharpe

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/why_do_so_many_muslims_embrace_religious_and_ideological_warfare.html?utm_source=feedly#ixzz2R90BuVgV
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 

“Religion of Peace”- Through Assimilation and Murder

Five more Iranians go on trial for converting

12 MARCH, 2013

201303120932.jpg

Since it’s inception the Islamic regime in Iran has been persecuting, imprisoning and executing Muslims who become followers of Jesus.

Five Iranian Christian converts who were detained late last year will reportedly begin trial in Iran’s Revolutionary Court this week, according to a human rights group following the case.

The five men were among seven arrested in October when security forces raided an underground house church in the city of Shiraz during a prayer session. They will be tried at the Revolutionary Court in Shiraz’s Fars Province on charges of disturbing public order, evangelizing, threatening national security and engaging in Internet activity that threatens the government, according to Christian Solidarity Worldwide, a religious persecution watchdog group.

The five imprisoned men, Mohammad Roghangir, Surush Saraie, Eskandar Rezaie, Shahin Lahooti and Massoud Rezaie are members of the Church of Iran denomination, one of the country’s largest house church movements.

Under Shariah, or Islamic law, a Muslim who converts to Christianity is on a par with someone waging war against Islam. Death sentences for such individuals are prescribed by fatwas, or legal decrees, and reinforced by Iran’s Constitution, which allows judges to rely on fatwas for determining charges and sentencing on crimes not addressed in the Iranian penal code.

All religious minorities in Iran, including Bahais, Zoroastrians, Jews and Christians, have faced various forms of persecution and political and social marginalization throughout the regime’s 30-year reign. But the government saves its harshest retribution for those who have abandoned Islam.

Read more

UPDATE

Protesters burned a flag belonging to the Libyan Embassy in Cairo on Monday to protest the death in prison of an Egyptian Christian suspected of proselytizing in Libya.

The Egyptian Foreign Ministry said that Ezzat Atallah likely died of natural causes. He suffered from diabetes and a heart ailment.

Four foreigners are still in prison in Libya for alleged espionage and proselytizing. They are a Swedish-American, a South Korean, a South African and an Egyptian.

Last week, Egypt’s Foreign Ministry intervened to win release from Libya of 55 Egyptians also suspected of trying to spread Christianity in the predominantly Muslim nation.

Brian McLaren: Anti-Evangelical Hysteric from Stand Firm by David Fischler

shel- no more comment from me – David is on the dime.

Brian McLaren: Anti-Evangelical Hysteric from Stand Firm by David Fischler

Brian McLaren took his “thank you, Lord, that I am not like other evangelicals” routine to CNN this week. In a post artfully titled, “It’s time for Islamophobic evangelicals to choose,” he writes:

I was raised as an evangelical Christian in America, and any discussion of Christian-Jewish-Muslim relations around the world must include the phenomenon of American Islamophobia, for which large sectors of evangelical Christianity in America serve as a greenhouse.

At a time when U.S. embassies are being attacked and when people are getting killed over an offensive, adolescent and puerile film targeting Islam – beyond pathetic in its tawdriness – we must begin to own up to the reality of evangelical Islamaphobia [sic].

The film in question was made by a Coptic Orthodox Christian, and has been supported by a cultist. I’m not sure what it has to do with evangelicalism, but McLaren will make any leap of logic or evience, no matter how ridiculous, to bash his erstwhile brethren.

Many of my own relatives receive and forward pious-sounding and alarm-bell-ringing e-mails that trumpet (IN LOTS OF CAPITAL LETTERS WITH EXCLAMATION POINTS!) the evils of Islam, that call their fellow evangelicals and charismatics to prayer and “spiritual warfare” against those alleged evils, and that often – truth be told – contain lots of downright lies.

Many of his own relatives—well, if that’s the case, I can see why he’d want to tar “large sectors” of American evangelicalism with his broad brush, especially in connection with—gasp!—emails. Reminds me that I need to write that post declaring the entire nation of Nigeria an Internet scam.

For example, one recent e-mail claimed “Egyptian Christians in Grave Danger as Muslim Brotherhood Crucifies Opponents.”  Of course, that claim has been thoroughly debunked, but the sender’s website still (as of Friday) claims that the Muslim Brotherhood has “crucified those opposing” Egyptian President Mohamed Morsy “naked on trees in front of the presidential palace while abusing others.”

The specifics have been debunked, but are Copts persecuted in Egypt? Are they killed? Imprisoned without cause? Have their homes and churches destroyed? Their children forced to convert to Islam under threat of their lives? From McLaren’s post, you’d never know that any of that was happening, but he does reject those fallacious emails, by George.

Janet Parshall, for example, a popular talk show host on the Moody Radio Network, frequently hosts Walid Shoebat, a Muslim-evangelical convert whose anti-Muslim claims, along with claims about his own biography, are frequently questioned.  John Hagee, a popular televangelist, also hosts Shoebat as an expert on Islam, as does the 700 Club.

It is true that some of Shoebat’s claims have been questioned. Disproved, I’m not sure about. But in any case, he’s one guy. Does an occasional interview with Walid Shoebat really qualify one as an Islamophobe?

In recent days, we’ve seen how irresponsible Muslim media outlets used the tawdry 13-minute video created by a tiny handful of fringe Christian extremists to create a disgusting caricature of all Christians – and all Americans – in Muslim minds. But too few Americans realize how frequently American Christian media personalities in the U.S. similarly prejudice their hearers’ minds with mirror-image stereotypes of Muslims.

“Irresponsible Muslim media outlets.” Those must be the equivalent of the emailers that McLaren is to wee-weed up about. Things like Al-Jazeera, official state TV in Egypt, Saudi state media, things like that.

As for the “mirror-image stereotypes” that evangelicals are supposedly bombarded with, can someone please direct me to the absurd videos that Muslims are making about Jesus? If we’re going to talk “mirror-image” here, then juxtaposing anti-Islam videos with violent mobs in the streets of dozens of Muslim world cities just doesn’t seem fair to me.

Meanwhile, many who are pastors and leaders in evangelicalism hide their heads in the current issue of Christianity Today or World Magazine, acting as if the kinds of people who host Islamophobic sentiments swim in a tiny sidestream, not in the mainstream, of our common heritage. I wish that were true.

Ya know, I’d like very much to oppose in the strongest terms the kinds of stuff McLaren is talking about, but since he has failed to provide any examples beyond a pathetic YouTube video given more attention by the White House than anyone else, and some interviews with one former Muslim, I’m at a loss to know who or what to denounce.

Islamophobic evangelical Christians – and the neo-conservative Catholics and even some Jewish folks who are their unlikely political bedfellows of late – must choose.

Will they press on in their current path, letting Islamophobia spread even further amongst them? Or will they stop, rethink and seek to a more charitable approach to our Muslim neighbors? Will they realize that evangelical religious identity is under assault, not by Shariah law, not by the liberal media, not by secular humanism from the outside, but by forces within the evangelical community that infect that religious identity with hostility?

What is it about former evangelicals-turned-liberals (especially when combined with a new political liberal fervency) that causes them to make such broad-brush, unsubstantiated, and hysterical claims about the people with whom they used to rub shoulders? Is it some kind of initiation ritual into their new tribe, the Internet equivalent of walking the aisle?

Exactly what “current path” is it that evangelicals are supposedly walking? McLaren has in no way demonstrated that there is anything more than a tiny fringe of evangelicals who buy into even what he so laughably calls “Islamophobia” (does listening to a Walid Shoebat interview really mean you think that all Muslims are al-Qaeda operatives?), yet he feels perfectly comfortable making apocalyptic statements about what we “must choose” between. For McLaren, it a choice between sticking your head in the sand and believing that radical Islam consists of nothing more than a few dozens nuts with bomb manuals, and believing that all Muslims are bloodthirsty Saracens ready to rape your daughters and cut off your head at a moment’s notice. Between those two, he’ll go ostrich every time.

The thing is, there’s a third alternative: see the world, and the Muslim population, for what it is, rather than what Brian McLaren or Terry Jones delusionally think it is. Me, I’ll take door number three, Monty.

Yes You Are Watching the “Religion of Peace”

The “Religion of Peace” sanctions violence against those that leave it “apostates” to another faith or atheism, against the infidels who refuse the “peace of conversion to Islam”, against insulting Mohammed who is the ‘seal of the prophets’, and sanctions intentional deception of non-Muslims when trying to advance Islam. The “Religion of Peace” believes in peace through CONQUEST and the universal reign of the “House of Islam.”

These are the teachings of the Prophet.  The older suras are trumped by the later ones – which call for violence and political Islamization. 

Islam made a turn away from moderation ages ago and we are watching the fruit of that move ripen.

Thankfully most Muslims do not follow this literally – unfortunately though it is the teaching and too many DO.

Unfortunately most Christians do not follow Jesus teachings rejecting violence against enemies literally either – as a vicious cycle only the Cross and His outrageous love and resurrection power can break – and they settle for the temporary power of violence too.

You need Jesus – His Holy Spirit living in you moment by moment. There is another game, another power – the deeper and older magic of radical embracing, love – no one desires to live the vicious cycle – that destroys human flourishing.

Stand Firm: News from the Religion of Peace -”necessary to destroy all Churches…”

News from the Religion of Peace http://www.standfirminfaith.com/?/sf/page/28538

I don’t want to suggest that this is representative of all Muslims, but let’s get real: this guy is not some minor bozo. From BosNewsLife:

The Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia said Friday, March 16, that all churches in the Middle East must be destroyed, adding to concerns among Christians facing violence, including in Egypt, where two nuns are already recovering after a massive attack on their guesthouse.

Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah made the controversial statement after a question from a Kuwaiti non governmental organization.

 

Earlier a Kuwaiti parliamentarian had called for a ban on the construction of new churches in February, but so far the initiative has not been passed into law, news reports said. The NGO, called the Society of the Revival of Islamic Heritage, asked the Sheikh to clarify what Islamic law says on the matter. He said in response that it is “necessary to destroy all the churches of the region.”

 

The Grand Mufti, who is the highest official of religious law in Saudi Arabia, as well as the head of the Supreme Council of Islamic Scholars, cited the Prophet Mohammed, who said the Arabian Peninsula is to exist under only one religion, reported Russia Today (RT) television, which monitored the remarks.

Supposedly, Saudi Arabia is America’s ally in the struggle against Islamic terrorism. And supposedly, Islam is tolerant of other faiths and desires only to live in harmony with those who believe differently.

Supposedly.

(Via Faith McDonnell of the Institute on Religion and Democracy on Facebook.)

This Is Why Sharia Law Should Never Be Tolerated

Shel boese – ignorant, often well-meaning progressives tend to reject classical liberalism which includes radical freedom of the state and religion because of a certain view of allowing the oppressed to become oppressors in the name of a weird blind to the big picture justice.  Tolerating Islamic law alongside civil lawcode rooted in Biblical values just doesnt work.  Shariah demands the deaths of ex-muslims. Period.  There cannot be compromise with shariah the only peace it knows is through conquest.  Read and learn:

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/303770/20120223/youcef-nadarkhani-iran-pastor-execution.htm

 

International leaders and supporters of Youcef Nadarkhani are calling for the release of the Christian pastor who has been sentenced to death in Iran.

Earlier this week, the Iranian regime is believed to have given the final execution order for Nadarkhani, who was imprisoned in 2009 for forsaking Islam and converting to Christianity, and eventually found guilty of the crime of apostasy.

Efforts from human rights and religious organizations to bring international attention to the case seem to be working. Late Thursday, the White House publicly condemned Iran for the verdict.

“The United States condemns in the strongest possible terms reports that Iranian authorities’ reaffirmed a death sentence for Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani for the sole reason of his refusal to recant his Christian faith,” the statement read.

“This action is yet another shocking breach of Iran’s international obligations, its own constitution, and stated religious values… The trial and sentencing process for Pastor Nadarkhani demonstrates the Iranian government’s total disregard for religious freedom, and further demonstrates Iran’s continuing violation of the universal rights of its citizens.”

The state department also expressed its concern for the pastor, and also cited Iran’s “severe violations” of “religious freedom,” while U.S. Reps. Joseph Pitts, R-Pa., and Keith Ellison, D-Minn. — the latter a Muslim — have sponsored a congressional resolution to call for Nadarkhani’s freedom.

“The persecuted are their own citizens whose only crime is practicing their faith. I believe this resolution is important so that the ayatollah knows the world is watching,” said Pitts. “If there are ways to communicate directly to Iran, then that needs to be done.”

While attention to the case has waxed and waned, the new, final death order has brought the Nadarkhani case back into the international consciousness. On Wednesday, German Human Rights Commissioner Markus Loening also urged Tehran to “release Nadarkhani, lift his death sentence and grant him a fair trial.”

Last Chance

Nadarkhani’s supporters are clinging to their final hopes that an execution order can be overturned.

The pastor’s lawyer, Iranian human rights advocate Mohammad Ali Dadkhah, who also faces up to nine years in prison for representing Nadarkhani, brought the case up to the Supreme Court and then to the ayatollahs, but failed to get the death sentence overturned.

Now that the final execution order has been given, Dadkhah has one final chance to stop his client’s date with the hangman, according to Dr. Khataza Gondwe, the Africa and Middle East team leader for Christian Solidarity Worldwide.

“There is still a chance to stop the execution once the execution order is given,” Gondwe said. “Lawyers can still take some kind of legal action.”

However, Dadkhah can only act once there is an execution date on the books, and there is a possibility that Iran will go ahead with the hanging before it informs Nadarkhani’s family members and legal counsel. Iran can hang executed criminals convicted in the revolutionary court and then produce the execution documents after the fact, which is what happened with Pastor Hossein Soodmand in 1990, who was the last time person that Iran officially executed for apostasy.

“That is why there is anxiety around Nadarkhani,” said Gondwe. “Because of the fear that he could be executed without notification.”

The added danger in this scenario is that the court can posthumously change Nadarkhani’s charge.

“They could just come out later and say he’s a spy,” said Jordan Sekulow, executive director of the American Center for Law and Justice.

“The execution list never has political reasons on it. Just drug trafficking, rape, spying and Zionism. There’s always a concern that they will do that.”

The courts have already tried to do so once. When news that the Iranian Supreme Court upheld a regional court’s death sentence brought heightened media attention to the case, Iran claimed that Nadarkhani had been arrested for rape and spying charges. These claims were belied by leaked court documents.

“The one written verdict we have seen has been for apostasy,” said Gondwe. “When other false charges were raised, it was an attempt to put a fig leaf over the situation.”

As global attention to the case grows, the apostasy charge becomes especially troubling for Iran. Christianity is a protected religion under the country’s constitution and Iran is a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — the precepts of which Iran seems to be breaking in this instance.

Additionally, apostasy is not officially a crime in Iran’s legal code, much less one punishable by death. However, because it’s a religious charge, the case has gone through Iran’s Revolutionary Courts, which also cover various official fatwas and religious regulations.

“The more attention that is shown on this case the better,” said Gondwe. “I don’t think Iran would act extralegally if the world is watching. Maintain the pressure. Keep this man alive.”

Christophobia – Like It Or Not War is Upon the Church: From one end of the muslim world to the other, Christians are being murdered for their faith.

The Daily Beast

 

We hear so often about Muslimsas victims of abuse in the West and combatants in the Arab Spring’s fight against tyranny. But, in fact, a wholly different kind of war is underway—an unrecognized battle costing thousands of lives. Christians are being killed in the Islamic world because of their religion. It is a rising genocide that ought to provoke global alarm.

The portrayal of Muslims as victims or heroes is at best partially accurate. In recent years the violent oppression of Christian minorities has become the norm in Muslim-majority nations stretching from West Africa and the Middle East to South Asia and Oceania. In some countries it is governments and their agents that have burned churches and imprisoned parishioners. In others, rebel groups and vigilantes have taken matters into their own hands, murdering Christians and driving them from regions where their roots go back centuries.

The media’s reticence on the subject no doubt has several sources. One may be fear of provoking additional violence. Another is most likely the influence of lobbying groups such as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation—a kind of United Nations of Islam centered in Saudi Arabia—and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Over the past decade, these and similar groups have been remarkably successful in persuading leading public figures and journalists in the West to think of each and every example of perceived anti-Muslim discrimination as an expression of a systematic and sinister derangement called “Islamophobia”—a term that is meant to elicit the same moral disapproval as xenophobia or homophobia.

But a fair-minded assessment of recent events and trends leads to the conclusion that the scale and severity of Islamophobia pales in comparison with the bloody Christophobia currently coursing through Muslim-majority nations from one end of the globe to the other. The conspiracy of silence surrounding this violent expression of religious intolerance has to stop. Nothing less than the fate of Christianity—and ultimately of all religious minorities—in the Islamic world is at stake.

Egypt Coptic Christians

At least 24 Coptic Christians were killed in Cairo during clashes with the Egyptian Army on Oct. 9., Thomas Hartwell / Redux

 

From blasphemy laws to brutal murders to bombings to mutilations and the burning of holy sites, Christians in so many nations live in fear. In Nigeria many have suffered all of these forms of persecution. The nation has the largest Christian minority (40 percent) in proportion to its population (160 million) of any majority-Muslim country. For years, Muslims and Christians in Nigeria have lived on the edge of civil war. Islamist radicals provoke much if not most of the tension. The newest such organization is an outfit that calls itself Boko Haram, which means “Western education is sacrilege.” Its aim is to establish Sharia in Nigeria. To this end it has stated that it will kill all Christians in the country.

In the month of January 2012 alone, Boko Haram was responsible for 54 deaths. In 2011 its members killed at least 510 people and burned down or destroyed more than 350 churches in 10 northern states. They use guns, gasoline bombs, and even machetes, shouting “Allahu akbar” (“God is great”) while launching attacks on unsuspecting citizens. They have attacked churches, a Christmas Day gathering (killing 42 Catholics), beer parlors, a town hall, beauty salons, and banks. They have so far focused on killing Christian clerics, politicians, students, policemen, and soldiers, as well as Muslim clerics who condemn their mayhem. While they started out by using crude methods like hit-and-run assassinations from the back of motorbikes in 2009, the latest AP reports indicate that the group’s recent attacks show a new level of potency and sophistication.

The Christophobia that has plagued Sudan for years takes a very different form. The authoritarian government of the Sunni Muslim north of the country has for decades tormented Christian and animist minorities in the south. What has often been described as a civil war is in practice the Sudanese government’s sustained persecution of religious minorities. This persecution culminated in the infamous genocide in Darfur that began in 2003. Even though Sudan’s Muslim president, Omar al-Bashir, has been indicted by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, which charged him with three counts of genocide, and despite the euphoria that greeted the semi-independence he grant-ed to South Sudan in July of last year, the violence has not ended. In South Kordofan, Christians are still subject-ed to aerial bombardment, targeted killings, the kidnap-ping of children, and other atrocities. Reports from the United Nations indicate that between 53,000 and 75,000 innocent civilians have been displaced from their resi-dences and that houses and buildings have been looted and destroyed.

Both kinds of persecution—undertaken by extragovernmental groups as well as by agents of the state—have come together in Egypt in the aftermath of the Arab Spring. On Oct. 9 of last year in the Maspero area of Cairo, Coptic Christians (who make up roughly 11 percent of Egypt’s population of 81 million) marched in protest against a wave of attacks by Islamists—including church burnings, rapes, mutilations, and murders—that followed the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak’s dictatorship. During the protest, Egyptian security forces drove their trucks into the crowd and fired on protesters, crushing and killing at least 24 and wounding more than 300 people. By the end of the year more than 200,000 Copts had fled their homes in anticipation of more attacks. With Islamists poised to gain much greater power in the wake of recent elections, their fears appear to be justified.

Egypt is not the only Arab country that seems bent on wiping out its Christian minority. Since 2003 more than 900 Iraqi Christians (most of them Assyrians) have been killed by terrorist violence in Baghdad alone, and 70 churches have been burned, according to the Assyrian International News Agency (AINA). Thousands of Iraqi Christians have fled as a result of violence directed specifically at them, reducing the number of Christians in the country to fewer than half a million from just over a million before 2003. AINA understandably describes this as an “incipient genocide or ethnic cleansing of Assyrians in Iraq.”

The 2.8 million Christians who live in Pakistan make up only about 1.6 percent of the population of more than 170 million. As members of such a tiny minority, they live in perpetual fear not only of Islamist terrorists but also of Pakistan’s draconian blasphemy laws. There is, for example, the notorious case of a Christian woman who was sentenced to death for allegedly insulting the Prophet Muhammad. When international pressure persuaded Punjab Gov. Salman Taseer to explore ways of freeing her, he was killed by his bodyguard. The bodyguard was then celebrated by prominent Muslim clerics as a hero—and though he was sentenced to death late last year, the judge who imposed the sentence now lives in hiding, fearing for his life.

Such cases are not unusual in Pakistan. The nation’s blasphemy laws are routinely used by criminals and intolerant Pakistani Muslims to bully religious minorities. Simply to declare belief in the Christian Trinity is considered blasphemous, since it contradicts mainstream Muslim theological doctrines. When a Christian group is suspected of transgressing the blasphemy laws, the consequences can be brutal. Just ask the members of the Christian aid group World Vision. Its offices were attacked in the spring of 2010 by 10 gunmen armed with grenades, leaving six people dead and four wounded. A militant Muslim group claimed responsibility for the attack on the grounds that World Vision was working to subvert Islam. (In fact, it was helping the survivors of a major earthquake.)

EGYPTIAN COPTIC CHRISITANS

At least 13 people were killed and 140 injured on March 8, 2011, when participants in a large Christian demonstration in a Cairo slum were attacked by residents of a surrounding neighborhood., Mohamed Omar / EPA-Landov

 

Not even Indonesia—often touted as the world’s most tolerant, democratic, and modern majority-Muslim nation—has been immune to the fevers of Christophobia. According to data compiled by theChristian Post, the number of violent incidents committed against religious minorities (and at 7 percent of the population, Christians are the country’s largest minority) increased by nearly 40 percent, from 198 to 276, between 2010 and 2011.

The litany of suffering could be extended. In Iran dozens of Christians have been arrested and jailed for daring to worship outside of the officially sanctioned church system. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, deserves to be placed in a category of its own. Despite the fact that more than a million Christians live in the country as foreign workers, churches and even private acts of Christian prayer are banned; to enforce these totalitarian restrictions, the religious police regularly raid the homes of Christians and bring them up on charges of blasphemy in courts where their testimony carries less legal weight than a Muslim’s. Even in Ethiopia, where Christians make up a majority of the population, church burnings by members of the Muslim minority have become a problem.

It should be clear from this catalog of atrocities that anti-Christian violence is a major and underreported problem. No, the violence isn’t centrally planned or coordinated by some international Islamist agency. In that sense the global war on Christians isn’t a traditional war at all. It is, rather, a spontaneous expression of anti-Christian animus by Muslims that transcends cultures, regions, and ethnicities.

As Nina Shea, director of the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, pointed out in an interview with Newsweek, Christian minorities in many majority-Muslim nations have “lost the protection of their societies.” This is especially so in countries with growing radical Islamist (Salafist) movements. In those nations, vigilantes often feel they can act with impunity—and government inaction often proves them right. The old idea of the Ottoman Turks—that non-Muslims in Muslim societies deserve protection (albeit as second-class citizens)—has all but vanished from wide swaths of the Islamic world, and increasingly the result is bloodshed and oppression.

So let us please get our priorities straight. Yes, Western governments should protect Muslim minorities from intolerance. And of course we should ensure that they can worship, live, and work freely and without fear. It is the protection of the freedom of conscience and speech that distinguishes free societies from unfree ones. But we also need to keep perspective about the scale and severity of intolerance. Cartoons, films, and writings are one thing; knives, guns, and grenades are something else entirely.

As for what the West can do to help religious minorities in Muslim-majority societies, my answer is that it needs to begin using the billions of dollars in aid it gives to the offending countries as leverage. Then there is trade and investment. Besides diplomatic pressure, these aid and trade relationships can and should be made conditional on the protection of the freedom of conscience and worship for all citizens.

Instead of falling for overblown tales of Western Islamophobia, let’s take a real stand against the Christophobia infecting the Muslim world. Tolerance is for everyone—except the intolerant.

Courage – Get Out of Bed and Get in a Church! Iranian Brother About to Be Killed by the “religion of peace”

Shel Boese / Shelby Boese – Pray for this Iranian brother in Christ.  When you struggle to get out of bed to worship in a free nation – remember sleeping that extra 20 minutes is a luxery of priviledge.  Jesus died and rose to redeem us, take us out of Satan’s curse and restore the likeness and image of God.  Would to God my Iranian brothers and sisters worst problem was lack of willpower to worship.

FYI – this is why I would oppose all forms of sharia law in western nations – converting out of Islam is a capital offense.

Courage By  on Dec 17, 2011

Iranian pastor, Youcef Nadarkhani will remain in prison:

In late September of this year, he was given four chances to recant his faith in court and refused each time. His case then was referred to the ayatollah. The American Center for Law and Justice reported one of his court exchanges.

“Repent means to return. What should I return to? To the blasphemy that I had before my faith in Christ?” Nadarkhani asked.

“To the religion of your ancestors, Islam,” the judge reportedly replied.

“I cannot,” the pastor responded.

Related: Youcef Nadarkhani’s Letter to His Church

Islamic Law is not Acceptable In A Democratic Republic. Period.

Shel Boese / Shelby Boese – it should be clear that there must be a zero tolerance policy for Islamic law in the US.  Islamic worship – no problem.  But the religion must change in the US context – just as there are no state churches making civil and criminal claims on individuals in the US.  They had to adapt from the state church models of old Europe.

 

“Another example of efforts to usurp the Constitution are the actions of the global Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), whose main agenda is to have “hate speech” laws enforced against anyone who criticizes Islam.  And, unfortunately, there are those determined to enforce sharia on their own who attack and murder any nearby dissenters.  The Qu’ran justifies and protects these people’s violence by declaring that it is blasphemous to mock or degrade any component of Islam.  According to sharia law, such activity is punishable by death.”

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/11/the_case_for_banning_sharia_law_in_america.html#ixzz1dd0yQIC8

The Case for Banning Sharia Law in America

By JanSuzanne Krasner

 The incompatibility of Islamic sharia law with secular courts stems from the underpinning of Islamism — the unyielding union of the laws and punishments of the Qu’ran and Hadiths with the country’s legal and political system.  Sharia law is the legislation of these religious and criminal rules, which rejects America’s constitutional secularism and legal penalties.

The Qu’ran commands Muslims to change secular laws to conform to sharia, eventually establishing Islamic law worldwide.  Islamic courts want their fatwas to supersede the civil and criminal laws, untying Muslims from civil secular courts.

The facts reveal that in 2008, when the first sharia court was recognized in the U.K., within one year, over 85 recognized sharia courts were established within the U.K.’s Tribunal Court system.  The problem with this rapidly spreading dogma is that several of these courts have issued some fatwas that are completely incompatible with British and European law.

As Islam is a male-dominated ideology, the laws of the Qu’ran make half of its devotees, its female population, second-class citizens.  This inequality has drawn recent attention to the need for additional British legislation to rein in these courts so they abide by British law.

It appears that once any legal system opens its doors to Islamic law, that door will be hard to close…and eventually, the only thing missing will be a parallel Islamic government.

But even with this reality in front of Americans, there are still many who insist that our laws will prevent such circumstances from ever occurring in the U.S.  And because of this nonchalant attitude, there are numbers of people, both Muslim and non-Muslim, who believe that sharia law is not a threat to non-Muslim Americans or to the Western liberal democratic rule of law.

Sharia Law Is in the U.S.

The possibility that Muslim-only towns and urban enclaves could be created in the U.S. seems unimaginable to most Americans, but it already is a reality.  Just travel 150 mile northwest of New York City to the woods of the western Catskills, and you will find Islamberg, a private Muslim community founded in 1980 by Sheikh Syed Mubarik Ali Shah Gilani.  Sheikh Gilani is said to be one of the founders of Jamaat al-Fuqra, a terrorist organization believed to be responsible for dozens of bombings and murders in the U.S. and abroad.

Islamberg is only one of twenty to thirty Muslim-only communities and training compounds that this Pakistani group supports through Muslim affiliates in America.  This radical group has purchased land in isolated areas close to city networks and infrastructure.  Jamaat al-Fuqra now has sites in Alabama, Georgia, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Pennsylvania, California, Washington, Colorado, Michigan, and Illinois, as well as Canada, Venezuela, and Trinidad.

The sharia debate in the U.S. is heating up as more and more Americans are reacting to lawyers requesting rulings based on sharia law, and local judges agreeing to make them.  This has happened in a New Jersey divorce case, a Maryland child custody case, and most recently in a Florida property case.  These cases are now a precedent for other American-Muslim communities.  In addition, according to the Center for Security Policy study that was published in May 2011, there are actually over fifty Appellate Court cases from 23 states that all involve conflicts between sharia law and American state law.

There are numbers of Muslim community leaders challenging the delicate line between religious freedom and the laws against state religion by petitioning in favor of living under sharia law.  The moment one court allows the establishment of an independently ruled enclave, others courts in liberal cities across the nation will petition for the same opportunity.

Another example of efforts to usurp the Constitution are the actions of the global Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), whose main agenda is to have “hate speech” laws enforced against anyone who criticizes Islam.  And, unfortunately, there are those determined to enforce sharia on their own who attack and murder any nearby dissenters.  The Qu’ran justifies and protects these people’s violence by declaring that it is blasphemous to mock or degrade any component of Islam.  According to sharia law, such activity is punishable by death.

It is this ongoing effort to shut down public criticism of Islam that presents the gravest danger to America — one that the Muslim Brotherhood and its Salafist organizations regard as key to limiting individual rights over the rights of the community.  The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), along with other Islamic activist groups, continues to push back, often with demonization of character and follow-up lawsuits.  Recently, intimidation and character assassination have been used against U.S. politicians who question Islamism or want hearings on issues relating to radical Islamic terrorism, along with those Congressmen who introduce state legislation to ban all foreign law.

Preventing Sharia through Legislation

The Court of Appeals is the system used to review lower court decisions and believed by some to be the stopgap against foreign law, including sharia, from entering our legal system.  However, some Islamic cases that have reached the Appellate Court for review have retained the sharia rulings even in the face of sharia’s contradiction to American civil law.

The U.S. is heading towards dangerous territory if its citizens buy into the twisting of constitutional amendments.  Indeed, what everyone really needs is the interpretations of the laws as they are written in order to prevent the encroachment of Islamism into the court system.

The establishment of sharia courts within the arbitration laws is a leading objective of every peace-loving, kindhearted, moderate male Muslim.  I have asked several male American Muslims whom I know, some living very happily in my community and in the U.S., what their one greatest wish is.  The answer is always the same: “Everyone should be a Muslim.”

The line must be drawn in states’ legislatures, not in the courts.  It is imperative that we recognize the differences between the religion of Islam and the ideology of Islamism.  Political correctness is leading to interpretations of the Constitution and its amendments that are pushing America across that line.

If non-Muslim Americans do not recognize how close they are to the precipice, then they are beyond a shadow of a doubt going to fall victims to an Islamic conquest.  Time is running out.